+1 vote
19 views

Consider

Statement I (p ∧ ~ q) ∧ (~ P ∧ q) is a fallacy,

Statement II (p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p) is a tautology. 

(a) Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II is a correct explanation for Statement I

(b) Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II is not a correct explanation for Statement I

(c) Statement I is true, Statement II is false

(d) Statement I is false, Statement II is true

in Uncategorized by Expert (10.9k points) | 19 views

1 Answer

+1 vote
Best answer

(b) Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II is not a correct explanation for Statement I

Explanation:
Statement I and II are both true but, they are independent of each other and hence cannot be used to explain each other by simple transformationsSolution img

 

by Expert (10.9k points)
714 questions
695 answers
11 comments
24 users