menu search
person

Consider

Statement I (p ∧ ~ q) ∧ (~ P ∧ q) is a fallacy,

Statement II (p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p) is a tautology. 

(a) Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II is a correct explanation for Statement I

(b) Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II is not a correct explanation for Statement I

(c) Statement I is true, Statement II is false

(d) Statement I is false, Statement II is true

thumb_up_alt 1 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
24 views

1 Answer

 
verified

(b) Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II is not a correct explanation for Statement I

Explanation:
Statement I and II are both true but, they are independent of each other and hence cannot be used to explain each other by simple transformationsSolution img

 

thumb_up_alt 1 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
...