menu search
brightness_auto
more_vert

Consider

Statement I (p ∧ ~ q) ∧ (~ P ∧ q) is a fallacy,

Statement II (p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p) is a tautology. 

(a) Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II is a correct explanation for Statement I

(b) Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II is not a correct explanation for Statement I

(c) Statement I is true, Statement II is false

(d) Statement I is false, Statement II is true

thumb_up_off_alt 1 like thumb_down_off_alt 0 dislike

1 Answer

more_vert
 
verified
Best answer

(b) Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II is not a correct explanation for Statement I

Explanation:
Statement I and II are both true but, they are independent of each other and hence cannot be used to explain each other by simple transformationsSolution img

 

thumb_up_off_alt 1 like thumb_down_off_alt 0 dislike

Related questions

thumb_up_off_alt 1 like thumb_down_off_alt 0 dislike
1 answer
thumb_up_off_alt 1 like thumb_down_off_alt 0 dislike
1 answer
thumb_up_off_alt 0 like thumb_down_off_alt 0 dislike
1 answer
thumb_up_off_alt 0 like thumb_down_off_alt 0 dislike
1 answer

4.8k questions

4.3k answers

67 comments

388 users

...